![]() |
|||||
|
NEWS RELEASE Thursday 19th May 2005 Edinburgh Airport announcement: Responding to today's announcement by BAA plc regarding
their expansion plans for Edinburgh Airport, TRANSform Scotland described
the plans as "incompatible with protection of the environment". Colin Howden, TRANSform Scotland Campaign Manager,
said: "BAA's insatiable demands for expansion are
entirely incompatible with protection of the environment. It wants more
of everything - airports, runways, terminals - while paying lip service
to the notion of sustainability. "An air transport policy based on ignorance
of the real, growing and lasting environmental burdens of air transport
would be a gigantic confidence trick. BAA's job claims pander to the understandable
fear of missing out on inward investment – but these claims all
too often prove illusory. "We believe that plans to safeguard land at
both Glasgow and Edinburgh for future new runway capacity should also
be ruled out on environmental and sustainability grounds. We accept that
there may be a case for the carefully controlled expansion of both major
Scottish airports, but only within their present physical boundaries and
in line with sustainability criteria." ENDS Notes to editors:
TRANSform Scotland is a member of the Green Skies
Alliance - http://www.greenskies.org [2] Air transport growth trends UK Government projections suggest that air passenger
numbers may increase from 180 million per annum today to anywhere between
349 to 461 million in 2020, or as high as 600 million by 2030. Such projections
reflect an old, discredited “predict and provide” model for
this industry, and one that would entail uncontrolled environmental damage. [3] Climate change emissions Greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft are uniquely
damaging and are likely to increase substantially over the next 50 years.
By 2050 global emissions from aircraft will contribute between 4 - 15%
of predicted man-made climate change. Technological and operational improvements
will not be sufficient to offset the effects of increasing emissions.
We do not believe that emissions trading schemes as currently envisaged
will be effective. We need to see clear evidence of real greenhouse gas
reductions by this sector. [4] Need for switch of short-haul air to rail Rail travel is substantially less environmentally
damaging than air transport when comparing emissions per passenger kilometre.
For door-to-door journey times for distances up to 1,000 kilometres, rail
can be quicker. We want the Government to urgently begin a 10-year programme
to transfer all flights of up to 1,000 kilometres around the UK and to
our near European neighbours from air to rail. Eurostar have confirmed
that the Channel Tunnel Rail Link capacity could shift 40 million passengers
from air to rail by 2030. We are confident that simply by encouraging
an air to rail shift within the UK as well, NO extra runway capacity would
be needed, permanently removing up to 30 million internal UK air passengers
from planes to trains. [5] Need for removal of existing subsidies to the air transport sector
END OF NEWS RELEASE
|
||