Transform Scotland Treansport photo
home
contact
info
members
join
*
*

 

Joint Action against the M74 (JAM74)

MEDIA RELEASE

Thursday 24th March 2005

M74 decision:
"Hundreds of objectors to this road have signed our 'beat the bulldozer' pledges and we will challenge this decision in the courts"

Joint Action against the M74 (JAM74) [1] have today condemned the Scottish Executive's decision to go ahead with the proposed M74 northern extension [2] despite the recommendation of the Public Local Inquiry that the road not be built. The M74 Northern Extension, Britain's largest road scheme, could top £1 billion in cost [3].

Will Jess, Chair of JAM74, said:

"JAM74 is very disappointed by this announcement but sadly not surprised. It shows up the Public Inquiry for the elaborate sham it was. The people of Glasgow have never been presented with alternatives to this monster motorway.

"The project is an outrageous waste of money, £1 billion could be much better spend improving public transport, air quality and health in Glasgow.

"The M74 will devastate the environment of already disadvantaged communities in southern Glasgow to benefit the Executive's pals in the construction industry and commuters from outside the city for nothing the Executive's own figures show Glasgow's roads will be MORE congested after construction.

"The Executive and the City Council have condemned Glaswegians to a legacy of air pollution and chromium contamination.

"JAM74 is not going away, hundreds of objectors to this road have signed our 'beat the bulldozer' pledges and we will challenge this decision in the courts."

ENDS

Notes to Editors:

[1] JAM74

JAM74 is a coalition of community, environmental and sustainable transport groups. Member organisations of JAM74 include Residents Against the M74, Friends of the Earth Scotland, Scottish Association for Public Transport, the Scottish Green Party, the Scottish Socialist Party & TRANSform Scotland.[2] The M74 Northern Extension

Since 1999, the Scottish Executive has put in place a £1 billion road-building programme - despite its much-trumpeted commitments to sustainable transport and environmental justice.

The most damaging of the Executive's roads projects is Glasgow’s M74, the largest urban motorway project in Britain, and perhaps in the whole of Europe. The project, five miles of elevated multi-lane motorway slicing through south Glasgow, is a remnant of 1960s-style roads planning. There has never been an independent analysis of alternatives to the M74 despite its vast price tag and major environmental and social impacts.[3] M74 cost rises to £1 billion

The M74 has quadrupled in price over the course of one year: this time last year, the M74 was priced at £245 million.

In March 2003, in a note in an Executive press release, it emerged that the project would cost not £245 million, but between £375 million and £500 million.

The Herald (15/1/04) reported that the M74 may cost over £1 billion - http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/8048-print.shtml

[4] M74 Public Local Inquiry

The PLI into the M74 began on 1st December 2003 and will run on to the start of March 2004. JAM74, alongside Friends of the Earth Scotland, are the main objectors to the project at the Inquiry.

JAM74 have previously challenged the First Minister Jack McConnell over his "biased" remarks made in advance of the start of the Inquiry - http://www.transformscotland.org.uk/info/news/press/pr20031203.html

JAM74 have previously raised the complaint that the planning process for the M74 is inherently flawed in as much as the developer, the planning authority and the planning inquiry process are all led by the Scottish Executive. A final Ministerial decision on the project will also be taken by the Scottish Executive. JAM74 regards this process as potentially being in conflict with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).[5] JAM74's objection to the M74
NB: A detailed media briefing is available on request.

In brief, JAM74 are objecting to the M74 for the following reasons:
* The project is a waste of £375-500 million of public money because it would not reduce congestion levels in Glasgow. (i)
* It would devastate already disadvantaged communities and increase traffic levels on radial roads, which would become more dangerous for children and other vulnerable road users.
* When most Glasgow households have no access to a car (59%) this is an inequitable use of scarce public resources. The funds should instead be invested in public transport alternatives.
* This motorway would generate more traffic, seriously worsening noise levels, the city's toxic air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions.


(i) Central Scotland Transport Corridor Studies Final Report on M74 Corridor, pp. 35-48 and Figures 5.5-5.17. The report concludes that Glasgow in 2010 with the M74 scheme built “shows a network which is more congested (even with the additional capacity provided by the M74) than in 2000.” (ibid, pp. 42, 5.6.3).

END OF PRESS RELEASE

 

*
*

Site design © Textlynx, 2004